Telemetry-shaped inputs
Batch history plus steady-state appends so AI questions stay current without manual re-exports.
Bring warehouse tables and append-only events into a project-scoped query path. Row limits, time windows, and access checks apply on the server before results reach Cursor, Claude, or your own assistants—not after the fact.
Scroll for the walkthrough, or move the sliders in the demo—the JSON preview updates to match the guardrails you set.
| ts | user | event | status |
|---|---|---|---|
14:02:01 |
alex@acme.co redacted | feature_used |
ok |
14:02:04 |
alex@acme.co redacted | checkout_start |
warn |
14:02:09 |
sam@acme.co redacted | api_error |
error |
When on, email-like columns are omitted from the preview payload below.
Every new copilot or analytics assistant turns into a custom pipeline: one-off exports, fragile joins, and questions that are hard to keep inside the same access rules as your APIs.
Hiddenplane is for teams shipping product telemetry and warehouse slices into AI workflows—where scope, caps, and project ownership are enforced on the server, not left to whatever the model was handed in chat.
The flagship path we build toward: connect the signals you already collect, let ingestion and profiling stabilize the schema, expose bounded views to AI clients, and keep queries inside project scope with explicit limits.
Application DB, warehouse slice, or append-only events—with ownership tied to a project.
Ingestion and indexing paths surface metadata and health signals so questions start from known fields, not guesses.
MCP egress and analytics APIs expose list-and-query flows with bounded fields and caps—so assistants use the same paths as your services, not ad-hoc uploads.
Use the same prompts across Cursor, Claude, or internal assistants—against the same governed contract.
Tighten prompts and views using request IDs, traces, and workbench review—so what you ship to production traffic matches what you validated.
Scroll through a captured UI sequence—each beat matches a stage in the flagship story: connect data, shape questions in the workbench, and reuse what your team has already validated.
Databases, files, and streams land in a project boundary—with profiling so prompts start from known columns instead of guessed names.
Use chat and structured query flows to iterate on charts and tables—review and tighten before anything is treated as production-ready.
One place to chart, diff, and reproduce—so answers stay stable when teams change.
Keep approved analyses and datasets inside the same project boundary so teammates and AI clients hit governed views—not one-off exports.
Design targets for the telemetry-to-AI loop we describe on this page—not a performance guarantee for every deployment.
0
0
0
0
We bias engineering toward ingestion, analytics, MCP, and the workbench—the documented MVP path. Broader marketplace and billing flows stay behind that until the core loop is proven.
Batch history plus steady-state appends so AI questions stay current without manual re-exports.
List datasets, run bounded queries, return inspectable aggregates—not opaque blobs.
Row limits, time windows, and rate signals on high-cost paths—quota checks default to fail-closed in our services when limits cannot be verified.
Charts, diffs, and saved runs in the analysis workbench so reviewers can sign off before wider rollout.
Three loops from our flagship use case—incidents, feature adoption, and plan or tenant load—grounded in the same project-scoped tables your stack already writes.
Ask which features saw error spikes around a release—inside a time window, row cap, and column allowlist you set for model-facing queries.
Compare modules across tenants and plans with aggregates that stay inside project ACLs—ideal for PMs pairing with an AI client.
See which customer tiers drive cost or noisy traffic before you tune pricing—still governed, still quotable.
The social strip uses illustrative marks only—no implied customers or endorsements. Below is how we expect teams to evaluate real risk.
Mission
Help teams connect live product and telemetry data to AI so they can see what changed in minutes—without spinning up a new data project every time, and without treating scope and caps as an afterthought.
Same spine as the journey above—stated as the weekly decisions platform and product leaders revisit.
Land the tables or streams your product already emits—profiled so AI questions start grounded.
Let copilots draft SQL and charts, but only publish views that passed caps, ACLs, and review in the workbench.
Package the approved analysis for teammates and AI clients inside the same governed views—expand to metering and marketplace flows only when that is the problem you are solving.
Scope, security posture, and how this differs from pasting a spreadsheet into a chat window.
Create an account, open a sample dataset or your first source, and run a bounded question from the workbench or an MCP-aware client.
Built where high-volume product data is normal
Illustrative technology marks for visual scale and familiarity—they are not customer logos, case studies, or endorsements.